Search Article 
 
Advanced search 
Official publication of the American Biodontics Society and the Center for Research and Education in Technology
Home About us Editorial board Search Ahead of print Current issue Archives Submit article Instructions Subscribe Contacts Login 


 
 Table of Contents  
EDITORIAL
Year : 2019  |  Volume : 10  |  Issue : 3  |  Page : 55-57

Scientific Landscape of Dental Literature in 2018


1 Independent Research Scientist, Associate Editor of Dental Hypotheses, Isfahan, Iran
2 Department of Oral Biology, College of Dentistry, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Lincoln, Nebraska, USA
3 School of Dental Medicine, University of Connecticut, Mansfield, Connecticut, USA

Date of Web Publication28-Nov-2019

Correspondence Address:
Jafar Kolahi
No. 24, Faree 15, Pardis, Shahin Shahr, Isfahan 83179-18981
Iran
Login to access the Email id

Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None


DOI: 10.4103/denthyp.denthyp_104_19

Rights and Permissions

How to cite this article:
Kolahi J, Dunning DG, Rossomando EF. Scientific Landscape of Dental Literature in 2018. Dent Hypotheses 2019;10:55-7

How to cite this URL:
Kolahi J, Dunning DG, Rossomando EF. Scientific Landscape of Dental Literature in 2018. Dent Hypotheses [serial online] 2019 [cited 2019 Dec 7];10:55-7. Available from: http://www.dentalhypotheses.com/text.asp?2019/10/3/55/271953



In the information age, human medical knowledge continues to grow exponentially, leading us to what could be best described as a knowledge tsunami. In 1950, medical knowledge doubled approximately every 50 years, by 1980, it doubled every 7 years, and by 2010, to a mere 3.5 years. Even more startling, in 2020 human medical knowledge will double in a stunning 73 days.[1],[2]

Nowadays dental professionals face unprecedented information overload and must somehow manage it. Text mining, network visualization, and big data management techniques will help us to analyze and summarize exponentially growing knowledge in field of dentistry. In an intriguing effort, the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry has implemented a strategy to cope with dental information overload by publishing an annual review of selected scientific literature focused on seven different areas − prosthodontics, periodontics, dental materials, occlusion and temporomandibular disorders, sleep-disordered breathing, oral medicine, and oral and maxillofacial surgery and dental caries.[3]

Following our 2017 attempt,[4] in this editorial we aimed to provide a summary of the scientific landscape of 2018 dental literature using mapping approaches and making them both manageable and practically useful for busy dental professionals.

On 3 October, 2019, PubMed was searched via the query “2018/1/1”[PDAT]: “2018/12/31”[PDAT] AND jsubsetd[text] NOT "2019"[PDAT] to find all 2018 dental articles. Complementary data were extracted from Web of Science using relevant PubMed identifier. Author keywords co-occurrence and co-authorship network analysis were employed for scientific mapping. Bibliometric data were visualized through VOSviewer (http://www.vosviewer.com/, Leiden University’s Centre for Science and Technology Studies).[5] PubMed PubReMiner was used for text mining.[6]

A total of 13,222 records were found in PubMed and 10,991 records in Web of Science. According to PubMed results, the US (1395), UK (1361), Brazil (1239), China (1221), and India (652) published the most articles. Journal of Craniofacial Surgery (802), Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery (449) and British Dental Journal (419) published the most articles. In 2018, 18.3% of dental articles were open access, despite the fact that 28% of all scholarly publications were open access.[7] Author keywords co-occurrence network analysis showed that dental implant, periodontitis, dental education, and systematic review were the most popular keywords [Figure 1]. Interestingly, periodontitis was among the hot topics received the most online attention in 2018.[8]
Figure 1 Hot topics among 2018 dental articles

Click here to view


Co-authorship network analysis showed Romina Brignardello-Petersen (Department of Health Research Methods, Evidence, and Impact, McMaster University) and Hom-Lay Wang (Department of Periodontics and Oral Medicine, University of Michigan) had the most influence on the network considering number of articles [Figure 2]. Web of Science data analysis showed these to be the most active funding agencies for dental articles published in 2018 [Figure 3]: National Natural Science Foundation of China (339), United States Department of Health and Human Services (335), and National Institutes of Health USA (329).
Figure 2 Co-authorship network visualization among 2018 dental articles

Click here to view
Figure 3 Top ten funding agencies related to 2018 dental articles

Click here to view


Systematic review was a popular topic among 2018 dental articles [Figure 2], an important and encouraging finding given the growing emphasis on evidence-based dentistry. Yet, consistent with 2017 results,[4] ground-breaking issues such as artificial intelligence/machine learning, nano-technology, and genomic medicine were not observed among 2018 hot topics. Instead, 3D printing and micro-CT were cutting-edge technologies seen among hot topics.

Another noteworthy finding is that the National Natural Science Foundation of China funded the greatest number of dental articles in 2018 [Figure 3]. This outcome is not particularly surprising given that China’s total spending on research and development rose that year to a robust record $254 billion. Clearly, support for research efforts remains a high budgetary priority for the Chinese government, resulting in China’s continued growth as a scientific power.[9]

Financial support and sponsorship

Nil.

Conflicts of interest

There are no conflicts of interest.



 
  References Top

1.
Densen P. Challenges and opportunities facing medical education. Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc 2011;122:48-58.  Back to cited text no. 1
    
2.
Corish B. Medical knowledge doubles every few months; how can clinicians keep up? Elsevier Connect 2018. Available at https://www.elsevier.com/connect/medical-knowledge-doubles-every-few-months-how-can-clinicians-keep-up [accessed Oct 4, 2019].  Back to cited text no. 2
    
3.
Donovan TE, Marzola R, Murphy KR et al. Annual review of selected scientific literature: a report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. J Prosthet Dent 2018;120:816-78.  Back to cited text no. 3
    
4.
Kolahi J, Soltani P. Scientific landscape of dental literature in 2017. Dent Hypotheses 2018;9:29.  Back to cited text no. 4
  [Full text]  
5.
van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics 2010;84:523-38.  Back to cited text no. 5
    
6.
Slater L. PubMed PubReMiner. J Can Heal Libr Assoc / J l’Association des bibliothèques la santé du Canada 2014;33:106-7.  Back to cited text no. 6
    
7.
Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V et al. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. Peer J 2018;6:e4375.  Back to cited text no. 7
    
8.
Kolahi J, Dunning D, Rossomando E. Dental articles receiving the most online attention in 2018. Dent Hypotheses 2019;10:25-8.  Back to cited text no. 8
  [Full text]  
9.
Normile D. Surging R&D spending in China narrows gap with United States. Science (80) 2018; Oct 10. DOI:10.1126/science.aav6902.  Back to cited text no. 9
    


    Figures

  [Figure 1], [Figure 2], [Figure 3]



 

Top
 
 
  Search
 
Similar in PUBMED
   Search Pubmed for
   Search in Google Scholar for
Access Statistics
Email Alert *
Add to My List *
* Registration required (free)

 
  In this article
References
Article Figures

 Article Access Statistics
    Viewed162    
    Printed4    
    Emailed0    
    PDF Downloaded46    
    Comments [Add]    

Recommend this journal