|
 
 |
| ERRATUM |
|
| Year : 2017 | Volume
: 8
| Issue : 2 | Page : 53 |
|
Erratum: Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol
| Date of Web Publication | 11-May-2017 |
Correspondence Address:
 Source of Support: None, Conflict of Interest: None  | Check |
DOI: 10.4103/2155-8213.206106
How to cite this article:
. Erratum: Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol. Dent Hypotheses 2017;8:53 |
In the article titled, “Comparison of the Efficacy and Side Effects of Chlorhexidine Mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) Alcohol” published in pages 137-141, issue 4, vol. 7 of Dental Hypotheses[1], the sentence under the heading “Ethical approval” is written incorrectly as “This randomized clinical trial was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (#392408) and Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (#201402164877N18).”. The sentence should be read correctly as “This randomized clinical trial was approved by the Ethical Committee of the Isfahan University of Medical Sciences (#392408) and Iranian Registry of Clinical Trials (IRCT201504244877N27).”
| References | |  |
| 1. | Mogharehabed A, Behfarnia P, Nasri N, Iranmanesh P, Gholami SA, Yaghini J. Comparison of the efficacy and side effects of chlorhexidine mouthrinses with (Hexidine) and without (Epimax) alcohol. Dent Hypotheses 2016; 7:137–141.  [Full text] |
|
